- FAIR USE NOTICE
- HUBRIS, LIES AND DECEPTION (September 11 Attacks - Benghazi, Libya) (SECOND UPDATE 10/30/2012 A.M.)
- DERELICTION OF DUTY: OBAMA DID NOTHING TO SAVE AMERICAN LIVES IN BENGHAZI--AND LIED ABOUT IT
- BENGHAZI: THE TRUTH BEHIND THE SMOKE SCREEN. Bret Baier (Fox News) Special Report 06282013
Tuesday, August 23, 2011
I received an email yesterday from patriot, Grumpy Elder. That I thought worth sharing.
"Sandra is trying to help out a couple moms who's kid's have severe medical conditions.. The children's doctors have told the schools the children's conditions will be adversely affected by the pressures of standardized tests. The State says so what, the law is the law.. Sandra had a blog about it posted yesterday on Educators-- I reposted with a comment today on Grumpy..."
Grumpy Elder has granted permission to those who wish to re-post his post in an effort to right the wrongs by getting the word out, taking the South Carolina school system to task for an educational system who priority is standardized testing over the health of children. Please feel free to share and pass this on.
If those of you who read this yesterday thought a South Carolina's School Dristrict's treatment of Sharon Johnson and Gretchen Herrera's sons was ridiculous might want to change your opinion to criminal, last night we received an update from Mrs Johnson..
To update our case (Johnson family), our OCR complaint was accepted, an attorney was assigned, and now an investigation has begun. We also had to file a retaliation claim against the school district because they contacted my son's doctor in an attempt to have the doctor withdraw the medical opinion that my son was mentally unable to test.
To answer a question above, we could not keep my son home for the two weeks of testing for several reasons. His doctor advised us that to keep him out of his self-contained classroom for 2 weeks was not in his best interest. Also, the SC Dept of Education advised me that such absences would be unlawful and that if a student refused to test, there could be disciplinary action. And then if we did keep him home anyway, that would do nothing to help the next child who was forced to take the test against the wishes of his parents and doctor.Though my son's circumstances were unique, the problems with high-stakes testing and the "teaching to the test" philosophy affect all public school students.
The comment above Sharon Johnson's referring to was a reader comment on Sandra's Grumpy Educators.
Mrs Johnson's statement, if verifiable, means the School District made an attempt to either second guess the doctors medical opinion.. something way above the pay grade of most bureaucrats, or was trying to get the doctor to assist them in altering evidence in the case. ..
At least in my opinion
Does the governments obsession with standardized testing give them the right to endanger the heath of students with conditions that will adversely affect the students health.?
South Carolina says yes because Federal Law Mandates the Tests Regardless..
This is a scenario that will likely worsen if Obama's Race to the Top agenda is enacted.. and the Federal Government gains even more control over education.
In a U.S. Supreme Court determination, Troxel v. Granville, the justices relied on the 14th Amendment:
(a) The Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause has a substantive component that “provides heightened protection against government interference with certain fundamental rights and liberty interests,” Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702, 720, including parents’ fundamental right to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control of their children, see, e.g., Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645, 651. Pp. 5—8.
South Carolina appears to have ignored this fact with regard to two cases where parents requested their children not participate in standardized testing.
Gretchen Herrera's son has a complicated medical condition, which is exacerbated by testing regimes. His medical team recommended he not be tested as it puts his health at risk. The request was denied, Mrs. Herrera allowed testing, and after the first day of testing, his health was negatively impacted. If a parent had neglected the health and well-being of their child, they'd find themselves in court with the government stepping in to protect the child. In this case, the government is endangering the child and ignoring the parent. Grumpy Educators reported her situation here. She has taken her request all the way to Washington D.C., and her battle continues this year."
All posts cross-posted on PUMABydesign001's Blog